Vercatus · Site audit, archived · vercatus.com
What machines see
Access was complete; the gap was in what the pages said to buyers.
- Analysed
- 16 September 2026
- listed pages
- 40 of 40
- templates
- 5
- questions simulated
- 314
- machine identities
- 9
Four figures, each with its denominator
What the audit found
- Access was not the constraintEvery sampled page served and indexable; no AI crawler disallowed.
- The losses were commercialPlan facts disagreed across our own pages; no Offer markup; no stated path to buy.
- Topical ownership was thinQuestions split between our own pages; the crawler tokens had no defining page.
- The citation panel had not shipped on this run date; no observed-citation figures exist for it.
- Probes originate from Vercatus's network; they show how each identity is treated from this origin.
- Our own site; figures describe this run, not a customer outcome.
Inside the audit PDF, in order
- What machines seep. 1
- Key figures and the briefp. 2
- Summaryp. 3
- Crawler access, template by identityp. 3
- Performance by templatep. 4
- Answer coverage and unanswered questionsp. 4
- Issues, each with evidence and graded sourcesp. 6
- What to do, in orderp. 30
- Entity graph and most citable claimsp. 35
- Method and limitsp. 37
